The Cross-platform applications nowadays are facing pivotal choice issues in their phase of planning out their development. This is because mainly they have the following question in mind.
Whether should the application undergo development as a native application, or one should consider developing it either as a web-based or hybrid application?
This is a major query that a major of the mobile app developers have been facing these days.The question majorly focuses on the amount of work that you need to do for the development of the application.
For instance, if you opt for a native approach for the development of your application, the mobile application developers would be working on with the help of either Java ( in case of the Android app developers) or Objective C/ Swift ( in case of iPhone application development).
But, it turns out that the scenario these days is changing. For, when it comes to the native app development, points like such are not taken into consideration at all. Let us understand how.
We would be looking opportunities can be provided by each one of them, then compare both of them to find out the most appropriate choice for developing your application.
Why should you prefer Native app?
The reason why native app development is becoming a hot trend these days is that it comes up with its own set of advantages when compared with the hybrid apps and HTML5-based applications.
First of all. The native applications are much closer to the processor of the device, which means that native code will surely be performing better when compared to similar types of codes written for the hybrid framework.
Moreover, the native applications would allow you to build up certain unique set of features which may not be available in your hybrid application development, this clearly hints about you being able to develop different features over different platforms, getting integrated with your hardware on the mobile that you have been using right with the help of similar set of source codes, rather than you having to include a random module or make use of certain non-web component in the hybrid app that you have been developing.
Include this with developing such a user experience that helps your device have a wider exposure, whereas developing a native application would become much more of a compelling choice.
Thus, by including a framework that had a native component attached to it, we would be able to dig a step further with the essential costs to study the native development of your application.
The React Native
React basically was a series of functions with minimum amount of external side effects and also partial dependency on the DOM, this somehow helped Facebook to cut off the use of a DOM as the basic model for rendering into a specific pattern which directly permits the easy substitution of the native components in place of the HTML components and web views.
Thus, with the help of the dame codes, the application can invoke alert windows by making use of UIAlertView for the iOS apps as well as android.app. AlertDialog for Android applications; all of this with no need to write down any extra native codes to support the User Interface views.
Add the React’s focus on speed to this and compile it with dirty rendering, and you can come up with a marvelous-rapid-cross-platform mobile application with the help of just one code base.
NativeScript + Angular 2
Kendo UI was developed by strictly making use of the Angular Integrations by the Telerik team. However, when this was used for the development of hybrid applications and HTML5 apps, which would be creating a consistency with the cross-platform User Interface experience just by adding on certain tools to this type of framework.
Thus, when Telerik started working with the NativeScript so that it can come up with a true cross-platform User Interface experience, the Angular 1.x would be dependent on tight coupling that comes up with a DOM for the problems associated with rendering related problems when you are trying to develop a map for the native User Interface for the Angular Applications. But, with angular 2 coming up to the market, this scenario has certainly changed.
The looser type of coupling of Angular 2 with the DOM for rendering up the permitted set of designs of NativeScript to perform the same type of tasks that are being performed by Facebook when React Native is being generalized-thus paving out a way for the rendering and making use of the components in such a way that the DOM does not seem to be necessary further.
All of this results in an easy integration of Angular 2 with NativeScript, which would allow you to encode your native application in a commutative style that can easily run on any mobile application.
Comparing the two of them:
The important thing to be taken into consideration is that when you are comparing both the native-focused approaches, that is the React Native as well as the Native Script, they seem to be sharing a fundamental difference in their respective approach as to how would they be building up native applications from the same code base.
Where the NativeScript kind of has a holistic approach, which works on to the “ Write it just once and use it anywhere you wish to” kind of a policy.
This certainly means that a major of the User Interface elements end up being a lower-level, for the Native script plans out to manage the User Interface in a seamlessly transparent way and also repeatable form between the various platforms that it supports too.
Pair it out to the Angular 2, and you surely would be able to see various cross-platform applications, with the help of the Angular declarative User Interface focus, they seem to be slightly having a bit more slightly conceptual consistency, then the application would have to interpret between a number of the UI options.
On the other side is the React Native, that closes up to embrace the changes rather than hide the multi-platform nature of it. This certainly means that when you can write out the React Native code in a platform supportive manner, you also can come up with a more platform-specific User Interface layer.
Simplifying the above sentences, when React’s goal is to deal out with the business logic when it pans out to support the differences that come up in the UI rendering of each of the platform, the native script has its focus with developing a single platform experience regardless of whatsoever the platform may be.
When this is combined with the React’s focus of rendering out the speed and sealing out with its execution, you would easily be able to create a performance-focused cross-platform application which would both be able to run of a similar code base, and thus come up with certain platform-specific components.
Eventually, whichever platform you choose certainly depends on the needs of your application development-for instance the generic applications that make use of the generic database powered apps would certainly come up better with the native script for the UI is not the typical resource-intensive one.
Even with that case, utilizing the Angular 2 to develop a well-maintained architecture of your application would certainly require it to have tremendous amounts of speed benefits that would bring up React Native to the desk.
But, if you want to use the angular 2 with NativeScript then you have to come up with a traditional Angular architecture for the code of your application, this is not required with the React’s library approach.
Cross-platform application development has gone through a series of some fast advancements, and with the latest addition of cross-platform and native development framework; only this pattern can be continued.
Thus, when we have to choose over something between React Native and the combined NativeScript and Angular 2, this bears a striking resemblance to the fact of choosing over between Angular and React themselves.
On one hand, React has been designed in such a way that it is light in weight, a super fast framework for rendering which adds–on as a feature within the concept of a bigger application, whereas the React Native still makes use of the pattern which provides tools instead of making use of patterns.
Whereas, on the other hand, Angular is supposedly designed in such as way that it is more like an opinionated framework for developing an application which certainly comes up with the “right way” of keeping up with the applications, which is more likely to be called as a combination of Angular 2 as well as Native Scripts which is likely to be taken further adding on to the slight expansion of the deeper native device integration.
Hence, it completely is your choice to opt out for either of them. However, you should take the following points into consideration:
If the agenda behind your application is mainly focused on coming up with a complex user interface also inclusive of tons of rendering and random elements? If the answer to this question is yes, you probably should opt for React Native.
Whereas, if you consider developing a single cross-platform code base that comes up with a typical slightly decorative, more attractive kind of a User Interface, then the combination of Angular 2 and NativeScript is what that you should opt for.
For, it can help you understand the same type of advantages that you would observe while making use of adopting Angular for the web application, all of this with maintaining similar trends for development and a basic program architecture.
Steve E Jimenez is very enthusiastic about modern technology and shares the wondrous thoughts keeping facts and figures in mind. He prefers to explore the cutting edge tech stuff. He is an early adopter and would like to stay up-to-date concerning advanced trends in the Industry.